yahwoofkah's public notice

On the Record and for the Record to Show

    I Am          yahwoofkah ali el-bey
In full Life proper persona sui juris
All Rights Reserved without Prejudice(UCC1-207/UCC1-308 UCC 1-103)Private Allodial Land  murukan dominion At 33.759650 \  -117.010350nr [775 conlon dr hemet 92545]33.761170 \  -117.011240nr [865 brisbane st hemet 92545]33.761589 \  -117.011192nr [hemet 92545]
I Assert My full Birthrights - Sovereignty and Substantive Rights and claim toHereditaments Being a Sundry Free Moor/Muur and a (Natural Being) pursuant to: MoabiteMoorish Pedigree; The Free Moorish Zodiac Constitution: The Great Seal of the Moorish Nation(Ab Antiquo): The Treaty of Peace and Friendship - 1787 / 1836; The Sundry Free Moors Act of1790; The 1781 Organic United States Constitution: The Moorish Federal Financiers Act (UnionStates Army: 1861 -1863); The 1854 Roman Catholic Magna Charta: the Knights of ColumbusCode; The Ku Klux Klan Oath; The United Nations Charter. Article 55(c); The Rights ofIndigenous People: Part I, Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5; Part II, Article 6; The United States Supreme Court'Acts of State': The foreign Sovereign Immunities Act 28 USC 1601: et Sequa.. The Convention onInternational Road Traffic -Day 19. September 1949, The World Court Decision. The Hague.Netherlands - Day 21, January 1958 A.D = 1378 M.C. In reference to the Rights of the NaturalPeople and Substantive Rights, etc., the following are pertinent Supreme Court Decisions, (StareDecisis) to wit:1. The Right to Travel: The Right to Mode of Conveyance; The Right to Locomotion are allAbsolute Rights, and the Police can not make void the exercise of Rights. State v. Armstead, 60 s.778, 779, and 781:2. The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege,but a common and Fundamental Right of which the public and Natural Beings cannot be deprived.Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago 337 Illinois 200, 169 NE 22, ALR, Ligare v. Chicago 139 ILL.46, 28 HE 934, Boone v. Clark 214 SW 607, 25 AM jur (1st), Highways, sec. 163:3. The Right to Park or Travel is part of the Liberty of which the Natural Person, citizen cannotbe deprived without "due process of law" under the 5th Amendment of the United StatesConstitution. Kent v. Dulles 357 US 116, 125:4. The Right of a citizen to Travel upon the public highways and to transport one's propertythereon. either by carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege, which a City may prohibit orpermit at will, but a common Right, which he/she has under the Right to Life, Liberty, and thePursuit of Happiness. Thompson v. Smith 154 SE 579:5. State Police Power extends only to immediate threats to public safety, health, welfare, etc..Michigan v. Duke 266 US, 476 Led. At 449: which driving and speeding are not. California v.Farley Ced. Rpt. 89, 20 CA3rd 1032 (1971):6. The state is prohibited from violating Substantive Rights. Owens v. City, 445 US 662 (1980);and it can not do by one power (eg. Police Power) that which is, for example, prohibited expressly toany other such power (eg. Taxation / Eminent Domain) as a matter of Law. US and UT v. Daniels,22 p 159, nor indirectly that which is prohibited to it directly. Fairbanks v. US 181, US 283, 294,300:7. Traveling in an automobile on the public roads was not a threat to the public safety or healthand constituted no hazard to the public, and such a traveler owed no other duty to the public (eg, theState): he/she and his / her auto, having equal right to and on the roadways / highways as horsesand wagons, etc.; this same right is still Substantive Rule, in that speeding, running stop signs.traveling without license plates, or registration, are not threats to the public safety, and thus, are notarrestable offenses. Christy v. Elliot, 216 I 131, 74 HE 1035, LRA NS 1905-1910: California v,Farley 98 CED Rpt. 89, 20 CA 3d 1032 (1971).